Re: US National Design Policy Summit Report available
Mark Vanderbeeken | Experientia <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:03:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hci.experiencedesign |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Congratulations to Elizabeth! Here are some links you might find interesting: Presentation on the History and Future of Japan's Design Policy http://www.dexigner.com/product/news-g16760.html Core77 on US National Design Policy Summit http://www.core77.com/blog/events/what_would_a_us_national_design_policy_need_to_look_like_11867.asp The Best Design Policies Are Local: A review of the Shaping the Global Design Agenda Conference http://www.core77.com/blog/events/the_best_design_policies_are_local_a_review_of_the_shaping_the_global_design_agenda_conference_11798.asp On 22 Jan 2009, at 19:00, Elizabeth Tunstall wrote: > ***Sorry for Cross Postings*** > > The final report of the US National Design Policy Summit is > available for > download at http://www.designpolicy.org/usdp/summit-report.html > > It covers the rationale and outcomes of the Summit, the process and > criteria > for ranking of the final 62 policy proposals, the list of design > policy > related current activities by invited organizations (not just > participants), > and the raw list of policy proposals. > > Table of contents: > > Page 04 Executive Summary > Page 05 List of Summit Participants > Page 07 Why Does the United States Need A National Design policy? > Page 09 Design Policy for Economic Competitiveness > Page 12 Design Policy for Democratic Governance > Page 16 Scaling the National Impact > Page 14 What are the proposals resulting from the U.S. National Design > Policy Summit? > > Page 34 Conclusion > Page 35 Appendix A: Design Policy Summit Program > Page 37 Appendix B: List of current activities by Summit Invitees by > organization > Page 80 Appendix C: List of raw policy proposals > > Happy reading, > > Dori Tunstall > > Organizer, U.S. National Design Policy Initiative > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]