Re: datatree_order and datatree_parents questions
Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.ansel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting "Heath S. Hendrickson" <[email protected]>: > 1) Add the image to the start of the gallery > Actually, this like the easiest to implement as the datatree > function reorder() will take care of the incrementing of all the > existing images order value automatically. I'll just have to make some > tweaks to the delete function to make sure that we don't leave any gaps > when an image is deleted (and this may not be necessary, but I haven't > looked yet). reorder() actually will now refuse to work on objects without parents, so this won't work. > 2) Add the image to the end of the gallery I'd prefer this one. You have the number of images in the gallery - any reason you can't set the new order to numImages + 1? > Can someone provide a little background on why the full lineage is > stored and not just the direct ascendant? If it were only the direct > parent, then it would make a number of things simpler, not the least of > which are the image ordering issue I'm working on as well as the gallery > and image move functions. It'd also necessitate a lot of recursion to traverse the tree. Right now you can get a full tree, no matter the depth, with a constant number of queries. This won't be changing. -chuck -- "Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez -- ansel mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#ansel Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]