Re: Ansel::listGalleries()
Ben Chavet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.ansel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>: > Quoting Ben Chavet <[email protected]>: > >> Hashing is good, now for the details :) >> >> do we want: >> ansel/hash/image_full >> ansel/hash/image_screen >> ansel/hash/image_thumb >> >> or: >> ansel/full/hash/image >> ansel/screen/hash/image >> ansel/thumb/hash/image >> >> I personally like the 2nd option because it just feels cleaner. > > I'd prefer the first, since that way you have all copies of an image in > the same > place - relevant if you're ever poking around on the command line instead of > through code. Good point, but how about storage efficiency? the 1st option will have 3 times as many files in any given directory as the 2nd option. How about a combiniation: ansel/hash/full/image ansel/hash/screen/image ansel/hash/thumb/image I'm just trying to think ahead as far as possible, so we don't have to go through this process again. --Ben -- ansel mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#ansel Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]