Re: Horde 6 vs. Horde 5.3

Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.horde.devel
Organization Intra2net AG
Message-ID <2174087.NPfYb8PqQ0@storm>
Hi Jan,

On Wednesday, 15. June 2016 11:16:02 Michael J Rubinsky wrote:
> > The flipside is, that:
> > - Horde 6 will delay even further
> > - we won't be able to do any refactoring, e.g. switching to namespaces
> > - we won't have a repository split that would make the libraries
> > more attractive, e.g. by being available via composer/packagist and
> > thus attracting external developers
> > - we won't be able to do long-anticipated BC breaks that currently
> > hinder some development
> > 
> > The discussion is open.

doing a "maintenance" release before Horde 6 is a good idea.

As MJR mentioned, the removal of the basic view in IMP 7 is a bit worrisome 
for a "point release". On the other hand, if the next release would be Horde 
6 and users were still using those views, they'll complain, too :)
At least I'm using the minimal view, but hey, let's move forward.

Could we branch off the IMP view changes
or would that be too much git surgery?

Thomas

-- 
dev mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.