Re: Horde 6 vs. Horde 5.3
Michael J Rubinsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20160616094703.Horde.bpTGtp4w5y3_umg8Sm4lI0A@h4.theupstairsroom.com> |
Quoting Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]>: > Hi Jan, > > On Wednesday, 15. June 2016 11:16:02 Michael J Rubinsky wrote: >> > The flipside is, that: >> > - Horde 6 will delay even further >> > - we won't be able to do any refactoring, e.g. switching to namespaces >> > - we won't have a repository split that would make the libraries >> > more attractive, e.g. by being available via composer/packagist and >> > thus attracting external developers >> > - we won't be able to do long-anticipated BC breaks that currently >> > hinder some development >> > >> > The discussion is open. > > doing a "maintenance" release before Horde 6 is a good idea. > > As MJR mentioned, the removal of the basic view in IMP 7 is a bit worrisome > for a "point release". On the other hand, if the next release would be Horde > 6 and users were still using those views, they'll complain, too :) > At least I'm using the minimal view, but hey, let's move forward. > > Could we branch off the IMP view changes > or would that be too much git surgery? This would not be feasible. > > Thomas > > -- > dev mailing list > Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ > To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected] -- mike The Horde Project http://www.horde.org https://www.facebook.com/hordeproject https://www.twitter.com/hordeproject -- dev mailing list Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 5.6 KB) - not displayed