Re: Horde 6 vs. Horde 5.3

Michael J Rubinsky <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.horde.devel
Message-ID <20160616094703.Horde.bpTGtp4w5y3_umg8Sm4lI0A@h4.theupstairsroom.com>
Quoting Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]>:

> Hi Jan,
>
> On Wednesday, 15. June 2016 11:16:02 Michael J Rubinsky wrote:
>> > The flipside is, that:
>> > - Horde 6 will delay even further
>> > - we won't be able to do any refactoring, e.g. switching to namespaces
>> > - we won't have a repository split that would make the libraries
>> > more attractive, e.g. by being available via composer/packagist and
>> > thus attracting external developers
>> > - we won't be able to do long-anticipated BC breaks that currently
>> > hinder some development
>> >
>> > The discussion is open.
>
> doing a "maintenance" release before Horde 6 is a good idea.
>
> As MJR mentioned, the removal of the basic view in IMP 7 is a bit worrisome
> for a "point release". On the other hand, if the next release would be Horde
> 6 and users were still using those views, they'll complain, too :)
> At least I'm using the minimal view, but hey, let's move forward.
>
> Could we branch off the IMP view changes
> or would that be too much git surgery?

This would not be feasible.

>
> Thomas
>
> --
> dev mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ
> To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]



-- 
mike
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org
https://www.facebook.com/hordeproject
https://www.twitter.com/hordeproject

-- 
dev mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 5.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.