Re: Dynamic SMB location in gollem backend
Matthew <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:22:57 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.gollem |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/01/14 11:54, Carlos Martinez wrote: > I would tell you that I am also installing Gollem with smb backend and > have some basic problems with the implementation. I would want to know > if you had the same ones. > The main problem is about the usage: > *When my users have to edit a file other than txt or html (.doc, .xls, > etc), they have to download it, edit it and upload it again. That is a > undesired additional job for them*. > > I tried giving an alternative way to access their files: folders > network sharing throug smb. But this schema is not compatible with > file sharing of Gollem. > > I tested two backends: file and smb. > Each have advantages and problems: > *File* backend: due to www-data is the owner of folders, users can > share them because security is taken from Gollem tables. This is great. > But if folders are accessed from other environment out of Horde, all > users can see all folders, because there is no security. > > *smb* backend: due to each user is owner of his folder, security is ok > when they access from other environment out of Horde. > But users cannot share folders because security of Gollem tables > cannot override smb security. > > How did you solve the problem of downloading and uploading files when > users need to edit a file? Hi Carlos - thanks for your reply and comments. I wish I had some good answers for you, but I think I can only agree with you! As to editing files, I don't think theres anyway round downloading and uploading, when accessing through a web interface. The mechanism just isn't there to be able to do it - it's a browser limitation rather than a Horde one. I guess in theory if you go the all MS route, there may be some kind of ActiveX thing that could do it - but I'm really not up on it. For me it's not really a big issue as I'm using Horde for occasional/remote access to shares - when people are at the office, they mainly have shares mounted directly via SMB. Which sort of leads to your next query about file vs smb - as far as I can tell, you are right, but I don't really have a workaround to hand - maybe somebody else does? I haven't really tried the folder sharing feature of gollem, so I've not figured how it works with various types of backend. You may want to take a look at pydio (formerly Ajaxplorer) which is another online file manager which has some clever sharing stuff going on - I had been using it until now and it is good - but I'm switching to gollem since it allows my users access to everything via a single web interface. If that's not so important, then pydio is worth looking at. Matthew -- gollem mailing list Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]