Re: Change license of Horde sork modules

Quoting Jan Schneider <[email protected]>:

> Alright, let's try this: I think we've took a wrong approach to this  
>  problem. I'm pretty sure that no license was actively choose for   
> this and probably the other modules either.
> The LICENSE file said ASL, the page header template (that appears in  
>  all rendered pages) said GPL, and the library files said BSD.
>
> I fixed the template back in 2004, but obviously not in all   
> branches, at least the GPL is appearing again in the current code.
> I changed the BSD lines to ASL in February when I noticed this   
> inconsistency because I assumed that the LICENSE files was chosen   
> more intentionally than the library comments, simply because people   
> usually don't have an idea what a certain license implies, but can   
> read a license fine. Eric can maybe say more whether he has chosen a  
>  certain license for the Sork moudules by intention, or rather   
> because by copy'n'paste.
>
> Anyway, let's assume my assumption in February was wrong, and not   
> ASL was the intended license but BSD, which ich as much possible as   
> the other was round. We would be all set then, right?

This makes perfect sense to me.

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris
-- 
Sork mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#sork
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]