Re: Change license of Horde sork modules
Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.sork |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm confused, then. If having part of the app under the Apache-style license is okay, why the request to change the whole app away from it? I thought debian couldn't package it with the old license. ----- Message from [email protected] ----- > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:49:32PM -0400, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: >> >> According to the same expert, it's really okay to distribute parts of >> an app under a different license? That doesn't seem to honor the >> spirit of either license to me. > > AFAIK there no problem with parts under different license in a > software if licenses are compatible. But if we can avoid this, > it's better for some reasons. > > Regards, > -- > Gregory Colpart <[email protected]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E > Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ > -- > Sork mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#sork > Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ > To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected] > -chuck -- "we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris -- Sork mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#sork Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]