Re: Fwd: More design thoughts

Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.horde.whups
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Mike Baptiste <[email protected]>:

> My one concern is this sounds like it might reduce the flexibility of
> whups - where now we create 'types' with their own states (filed into
> classes like New/Assigned/Resolved, etc)  This makes it a very useful
> system.  So I worry about making whups too specific to software project
> mgmt.  Now this may just have been an example of how it would work,
> which is fine.

This was an email from 1999. I thought it might be interesting in light of
what we now have the groundwork to actually do; in no way am I suggesting
that we make anything less flexible.

> PS - Got sidetracked on my attachment work (gotta love no power in NC -
> 7 days!) but hope to get soem stuff posted soon.

Great!

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <[email protected]>
"People ask me all the time what it will be like living without otters."
 - Google, thanks to Harpers

-- 
Whups mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.