Re: more types stuff

Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.horde.whups
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Bo Daley <[email protected]>:

> The more I look at this the more I tend to agree that types shouldn't change
> too often. Given that states and priorities are different for each type
> there's no really clean way to move between types (it would be nicer if states
> and priorities could be applied to types the same way that types can be
> applied to modules, ie. many-to-many).

Since they come in sets, this seems less useful, but I guess... maybe if there
were type-sets and priority-sets, that could be mixed and matched that way?

> anyway for what it's worth here's a patch that adds the second step form
> allowing users to select a new state and priority based on the new type.

Committed, thanks.

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <[email protected]>
The alligators were there, too, in a bathtub inside the house.

-- 
Whups mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.