Re: formalizing SQL dependancy
Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.whups |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Jon Parise <[email protected]>: >> If not, it might be worth it to just compress the SQL driver into a >> single Whups_Driver class, acknowledging that this will always be a >> database-dependent application, and gaining a slightly smaller >> codebass/class tree in return. > > I think that's fine, as long as we stick to a database abstraction > layer. For those sites that aren't interested in setting up a full > RDBMS, SQLite is a nice option. Yes - but you reminded me of the reason I wanted to keep it: to be able to easily try out different abstraction layers at some point (I'd like to try an MDB2 driver for whups). So I guess I've decided I'm keeping it for now. :) -chuck -- "Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez -- Whups mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#whups Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]