Re: whups modifications
Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.whups |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Gary Weinreb <[email protected]>: > 4) changes to the ORDER BY clause of getStates and getPriorities to order > by ID instead of alphabetically by name, so that some control over > sequencing exists. I disagree with this. "Control" in your version is "create them in the exact right order, or start all over again if something changes". When you do it alphabetically, you can prefix a number to the state/priority name to make it come out however you like. > I like Chuck's idea of just having a checkbox to designate a Type as > default or not, presumably tied to a new whups_types field. If ya'll > think that's a better way to implement this, I'll do it, plus other > suggestions of improvements... I don't understand why you're talking about Types in this context - you can already associate types with whichever modules you want. I thought the cloning/templating was for states and priorities. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <[email protected]> "People ask me all the time what it will be like living without otters." - Google, thanks to Harpers -- Whups mailing list Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]