Re: Project future.

----- Messaggio originale -----
> Da: Mike Bowie <[email protected]>
> A: [email protected]
> Inviato: Mercoled=EC 3 dicembre 2008, 2:09:26
> Oggetto: Re: [PHPEclipse-devel] Project future.
> =

> Mauro C. wrote:
> =

> Mr C ;-)

Mr B ;-)

> =

> 1) I believe the way subversion is being used currently generally =

> "correct", with major development changes being carried out on a branch =

> and then merged with (or replacing) trunk.  I think in this case there =

> might be advantages in not branching however... I think we could get =

> away with tagging releases and developing in trunk.  Perhaps someone =

> else can suggest what we stand to gain from branching before a release; =

> given the scale of the development team and the volume of commits.
>

IMHO for big changes branch, otherwise trunk.
 =

> 3) Yes, yes there is.  I have noticed vast volumes of code which has =

> been commented out and left for dead; especially functions which are now =

> provided by Eclipse itself.  I've also found that a lot of the older =

> code lacks meaningful comments or in some case, any comments at all.  I =

> think we all stand to benefit from a few more in-line notes.
> =


I cleaned up many in 1.3, this is the reason why want to merge it as soon a=
s possilble.


> 4) I think the more we can leverage AST, the less heavy listing we'll be =

> doing on simple integration and the more time and effort we can focus on =

> other more complex features... it's also going to mean more serviceable =

> code; IMHO.

don't understand, sorry.


Mauro Casciari



      =


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great priz=
es
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=3D100&url=3D/