Re: Trac issues once again
Lester Caine <[email protected]> Sun, 06 Sep 2009 07:32:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ide.eclipse.phpeclipse.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. This is killing > the server and causing trac to consume all memory in the box. I have > given the box 3Gig of RAM, it worked for a while but now is being a > problem again. I have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did > enable a memory check we created some time ago to check the system > memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache processes). > > 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would move trac > from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both servers to read the > database, however this may be possible using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi > share. Input welcomed. > > 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. Don't know how > much work this would be, and don't know if this is the correct solution. > We may just be moving the problem around. > > 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that knows how to manage it's > memory. I have no idea on this one. > > 4. Just hope our little script works and leave it as is. > > That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would be a good > solution for this problem. Also the httpd processes consume huge amounts > of CPU. I could give the box another CPU. I don't know how much that > would help. It would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is > wanted. Or just disable msnbot via robots.txt? Half the trouble seems to be that these search engines trawl EVERYTHING, so every historic link with the result that every single update has a search link created. At one point I had 60 search engines all trawling my server, once one of the big boys lists you, all of the others join the band wagon :( So although it would possibly be nice that a search on one of them produces a result - is the cost of supporting them in computer power and bandwidth worth it? My local machines simply has a deny all robots.txt, while the ones at 1&1 have just a few select ones allowed nowadays - and nofollow helps on and historic stuff http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/050118-204728 -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july