RE: Re: How I plan to move forward.

From the looks of it, I don't hink it would affect us at all.  However, only Spindle folks on this list are replying.  I would suggest that you propose it to the Tapestry Users list and see what kind of response you get.

regards,

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Damian Krzeminski
Sent: Wed 2/15/2006 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Spindle-developer] Re: How I plan to move forward.
 
Geoff Longman wrote:
> <snip>
> TRADEOFFS
> ++++++++++
> 
> (1)"Only allow one Tapestry app per project"
> (2)"Spindle projects must have a, possibly empty, application file"
> (3)"Namespaces of any kind, application or library, must not overlap"
> <snip>

Geoff:
We (http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipXconfig) are in the process of upgrading T3->T4 () and only now I 
realize how much I depended on Spindle.

I do not think that any of the tradeoffs would affect our project, but even if they did I would 
rather reorganize the project to work with Spindle, than wait until Spindle will handle everything 
properly.

So thanks and +1 for imposing any trade-offs you need to impose to make it work.
Damian



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Spindle-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spindle-developer