Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc
Stefan Neis <neis-RCUrBZHvLvKSHq+C5vT0LZQlNPQFfrerqZSUQi4AVrg@public.gmane.org> Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:52:46 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ide.emx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307181350190.6221-100000@cdc-ultra4.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
On 18 Jul 2003, Eberhard Mattes wrote: > Stefan wrote: > > > But what is it supposed to do if e.g. both usleep and nanosleep > > are missing? > > select() Sure, but that wasn't my point. Configure is "often" used to check which out of two possibilities are actually supported but is completely lost if none of the two is supported. So much for "why would configure check for function xyz if it isn't prepared to get along without it?". Regards Stefan -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.