Re: Innotek libc license & release issues (was Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc)

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Andreas Buening wrote:

> > jep, I would say so. Can you give feedback to the list when you got
> > something from Knut?
> 
> Sure. Here it is:

Thanks for finding out some facts!

> >This libc is based on glibc/bsd libc/emx/written from scratch.
> It's based on the sys library of emx (license reasons).

That sys library originally was rather incomplete...
I'm wondering what's going to happen to e.g. fork().
But that level of detail can wait for the sources, I think.

	Regards,
		Stefan
-- 
Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.