RE: FC Representation/Deliverables
"David Riecks" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.facetedclassification |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/02/03 at 09:04 PeterV wrote: > Here's a question about the utility: does it let you build one tree, or > multiple trees (ie. facets)? It sounds pretty interesting! I'm gonna > check it out. Peter: OK, heres where my ignorance gets in the way. If multiple trees = multiple facets, then the answer is kind of iffy. This utility is primarily of an "encoding" type. You can create any number of hierarchies, any number of levels deep. You can have the same word appear more than once, though the utility is "cognizant" of this and will prompt you that you are creating a second instance of the word. When you search for this word later within the hierarchy, it will bring up all instances and show you the lineage of that branch of the tree and you simply click on the one that you are after. Again, as this tool is primarily for encoding the data into the IPTC meta data which is then embedded in the header portion of the image file, you can always choose multiple branches to add to an image. In that sense it allows multiple "facets" to be added. For instance. If I have a photograph of a cow in a pasture, the first two branches that I would pick would have to do with these two descriptors. If cow falls in the subset of "livestock" which is, in turn a subset of "animal" then all three of those keywords are added to the IPTC info. If "pasture" is a subset of "farm", which is a subset of "rural", which is a subset of "scenery." Thus you'd have at minimum the following words placed into the keyword section of the IPTC format within the header of the file: animal cow farm livestock pasture rural scenery If any of the above terms had "synonyms" set for them, those terms would also be transferred to the keyword section when you drop and drag the lowest "keyword" in that branch of the catalog. If you instead consider that a particular set of branches = one tree, and want to build a completely different tree, you can "backup" or "export" that set and either load a new one, or create a new one from scratch. Does that answer your question? I think this utility does an admirable job of making the job of consistently encoding descriptor terms into images a breeze. Whether or not it's a useful tool to others building faceted classifications, I'm not really sure.... but I'm sure you would know simply by giving it a twirl. -- David Riecks [email protected] Midwest/Chicago ASMP ph/fax 877-646-5375 http://www.riecks.com/ http://zillionbucks.com The Webhost for your Creative Business Controlled Vocabulary (http://www.ControlledVocabulary.com/) Your Independent Source for Creating Image Databases ---------- Thanks for playing. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/