Re: BMJ article

Jane Teather <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.infodesign.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Having read the report in full, I was struck by one of the case studies. 
One woman (whose baby, sadly, died of severe malnutrition and pneumonia) 
stated that she had read the label and understood that the creamer was 
not for use instead of breast milk (so illiteracy was not the problem 
here), but she noted that the can’s label showed a mother bear with 
baby, and that people in her village consider this an acceptable infant 
food.

It has been shown in several contexts with healthcare information that 
people will go to what might seem extraordinary lengths to fit new 
information into the model they have formed and with which they feel at 
least partially comfortable. So the combination of the logo and her 
cultural background was powerful enough to override any disclaimers, and 
her decision made sense to her.

As Conrad pointed out, the reproduction of the label in the journal is 
very poor (a low-res scan), so it is difficult to study the whole thing. 
As far as I can see, the bottle-with-cross-through-it is not given 
prominence; and there appears to be a lot of ‘nutritional’ information 
implying that this substance is some kind of valuable component of a 
good diet. But the logo is easily visible, and how very strange it is (a 
bear holding a baby bear in a vaguely human-like ‘nursing’ position; I 
don’t think we need to get too pedantic about exactly where mummy bear’s 
nipples might be). If you were to show it, by itself, to any group of 
people in any culture, I reckon the vast majority would guess that this 
is a product for babies and possibly children. If they wanted to show an 
anthropomorphic bear, why not show one holding a coffee mug?

Gunnar said:
> a disclaimer is good evidence that there has been a claim that needs dissing.
>   
Quite. Why they chose this logo is a mystery, but someone must have felt 
uneasy.

Regards
Jane

_______________________________
Jane Teather
JET Documentation Services
54A Ferme Park Road
London
N4 4ED

tel: +44 (0) 20 8348 9213
mobile: +44 7967 366 252
[email protected]

Fellow of the Communication Research Institute
http://www.communication.org.au 






___________________________________________________________________

Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: 
 [email protected]

To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit:
 http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe

For all Information Design matters:
 http://InformationDesign.org

Problems? Write to:
 [email protected]
___________________________________________________________________
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.