Re: "Photoshopped to Perfection"
Rob Waller <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:05:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Funnily enough this issue was in the news in the UK today, with a political party calling for the banning of unrealistically airbrushed images in material aimed at young girls - http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/dont-beef-up-keiras-bust-lib-dems-take-aim-at-advertisers-over-altered-images-1766549.html A commentator on the BBC mentioned a famous instance of this from British history - the Hans Holbein portrait of Anne of Cleves commissioned to interest Henry VIII in marrying her. He didn't fancy her as much when they actually met. __________________________________ Rob Waller Department of Typography & Graphic Communication University of Reading On 3 Aug 2009, at 22:18, Deborah Taylor-Pearce wrote: > Cafe, > > The article > > "Photoshopped to Perfection: The graphics editing tool is > praised for making people look their best and dissed for > setting the bar too high" > > was published in the _Image_ section of Sunday's _Los Angeles Times_ > (2 Aug. 2009) and is available online at URL: > > http://www.latimes.com/features/lifestyle/la-ig-photoshop2-2009aug02,0,3129812.story > > I found the piece by reporter Jeannine Stein especially relevant, as I > struggle to finish my new write-up on 17th-century portraiture and > problems of representation (e.g., the commercially-successful artist > Sir Peter Lely was similarly critiqued by some 17th-century > contemporaries for beautifying his female subjects -- especially those > trademark "bedroom eyes" which he gave to female and male sitters > alike, "So that Mr Walker Ye Painter swore Lilly's Pictures was all > Brothers & Sisters"). > > The artist's technologies of choice may have changed over the > centuries, but most of the issues surrounding human portraiture > (aesthetics vs. truth, the politics of flattery and physiognomic art, > etc.) are pretty much the same. ;-) > > Deborah > _____ > > Deborah Taylor-Pearce > [email protected] > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: > [email protected] > > To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit: > http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe > > For all Information Design matters: > http://InformationDesign.org > > Problems? Write to: > [email protected] > ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit: http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe For all Information Design matters: http://InformationDesign.org Problems? Write to: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________