Re: My research about how people in LIS see ID
"Caroline Jarrett" <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:00:42 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Charles: > I'm sorry. I must have been having a senior moment Ah ha - happens to you too :-) > This may be a political rather than a design point but I can't help feeling that the SNP must have benefited from getting its name on the list part of the ballot changed to "Alex Salmond for First Minister". Would it have done the same if he had been called Zack or Zoe? The issue of party names, i.e. whether parties should be allowed to describe themselves as they wish, was one that the Electoral Commission specifically asked us to investigate, and I believe that they had other research going on at the time on the same topic. Short version: The main effect we observed was that changes to the party name simply made it more difficult for our participants to find the party they wanted to vote for. Longer version with explanation: We didn't have that exact party name within the ballots that we tested, but we did have quite a wide variation. For example, in the ballots we worked with, we found all these variations on 'Conservative Party': Scottish Conservative & Unionist Party Conservatives Conservative Party Welsh Conservatives Welsh Conservative Party The Conservative Party And these variations on 'Labour Party' as: Scottish Labour Party The Scottish Labour Party Labour Party For each voting task, we showed participants a list of candidates and asked them to express a voting intention for the purposes of that day's test of ballots. We didn't ask for their future voting intention or previous voting history, but our impression was that mostly they did express a voting intention that aligned with their usual intention. Mostly, they expressed their voting intention in terms of a choice of party; the only consistent exception to this was the election for Mayor of London, where they mostly gave the name of a candidate. So - most of the time, the participants were looking for a party name and they wanted e.g. 'Conservative', 'Labour', 'Green' or whatever. Anything more complicated than that just confused them and made it harder to find the one they wanted. Best Caroline Jarrett [email protected] www.formsthatwork.com ___________________________________________________________________ Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit: http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe For all Information Design matters: http://InformationDesign.org Problems? Write to: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________