CFP - Workshop on novel methodologies for evaluation in IR
Mark Sanderson <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:10:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.information-retrieval.webir |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
CALL FOR PAPERS
Workshop on novel methodologies for evaluation in information retrieval
At ECIR, 2008
OBJECTIVES
Information retrieval is an empirical science;
the field cannot move forward unless there are
means of evaluating the innovations devised by
researchers. However the methodologies conceived
in the early years of IR and used in the
campaigns of today are starting to show their age
and new research is emerging to understand how to
overcome the twin challenges of scale and diversity.
Scale
The methodologies used to build test collections
in the modern evaluation campaigns were
originally conceived to work with collections of
10s of thousands of documents. The methodologies
were found to scale well, but potential flaws are
starting to emerge as test collections grow
beyond 10s of millions of documents. Support for
continued research in this area is crucial if IR
research is to continue to evaluate large scale search.
Diversity
With the rise of the large Web search engines,
some believed that all search problems could be
solved with a single engine retrieving from a one
vast data store. However, it is increasingly
clear that evolution of retrieval is not towards
a monolithic solution, but instead to a wide
range of solutions tailored for different classes
of information and different groups of users or
organizations. Each tailored system on offer
requires a different mixture of component
technologies combined in distinct ways and each solution requires evaluation.
This workshop calls for research papers (either 8
page full papers or shorter 2 page papers) to be
submitted on topics that address evaluation in
Information Retrieval. Topics will include but are not limited to:
test collection building for diverse needs
new metrics and methodologies
evaluation of multilingual IR and/or multimedia IR systems
novel evaluation of related areas, such as QA or summarization
evaluation of commercial systems
Novel forms of user-centered evaluation
Papers will be peer reviewed by members of the
workshop Programme Committee. They are...
Paul Clough University of Sheffield
Franciska de Jong University of Twente
Thomas Deselaers RWTH Aachen University
Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg
Gareth Jones Dublin City University
Jussi Karlgren Swedish Institute of Computer Science
Bernardo Magnini ITC-irst
Paul McNamee Johns Hopkins University
Henning Müller University & University Hospitals of Geneva
Stephen Robertson Microsoft Research
Tetsuya Sakai NewsWatch Inc.
Diana Santos Linguateca Sintef
Ellen Voorhees National Institute of Standards and Technology
Christa Womser-Hacker University of Hildesheim
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Frederic Gey U.C. Berkeley
Donna Harman National Institute of Standards and Technology
Noriko Kando National Institute of Informatics
Peter Schäuble Eurospider Information Technologies
SUBMISSION
Papers will be submitted as PDFs in ACM SIG Proceedings format
http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates
Submit final versions of paper to [email protected]
IMPORTANT DATES
Submission date Monday 4 February
Notifications by 20 February
Final copy by 3 March.
WORKSHOP ORGANISERS AND CONTACT DETAILS:
The Workshop Chair is Mark Sanderson.
Co-organisers are Martin Braschler, Nicola Ferro and Julio Gonzalo.
The workshop will be sponsored by Treble-CLEF, a
Coordination Action under 7FP which will promote
R&D, evaluation and technology transfer in the
multilingual information access domain.
Mark Sanderson
Reader in Information Retrieval
Room 225, Dept. of Information Studies
University of Sheffield, Regent Court
Portobello St, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 114 22 22648, Fax: +44 (0) 114 27 80300
mailto:[email protected], http://dis.shef.ac.uk/mark/
Good judgement comes from experience, experience comes from bad judgement