General Comment (Was Re: Logic As Formal Semiotic)
Rinke Hoekstra <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.semantic-web,gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Organization | Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Jon, others, As a reader of the [email protected] list, I would like to make the following comment. Your recent frequent (cross)posts to this list give me a strong feeling of deja-vu in an oh-no-not-again sort of way. I recall the fuss that arose in the good old days of the SUO mailinglist, and would very much like to be refrained from a re-enactment of those events. This is a mailing list for discussing Semantic Web technology, and not philosophical issues related to ontology. Could you please try to prevent too much leakage of Ontolog-forum discussions to this list? Thanks! Best regards, Rinke Hoekstra Jon Awbrey wrote: > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o > > LAFS. Note 5 > > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o > > I have been saying that C.S. Peirce defined logic as "formal semiotic", > that is, a formal theory of signs, and I've been saying also that this > conception of logic develops a classical line of thinking that regards > logic among the normative sciences. A normative science may be viewed > as a "design science", an inquiry into what ought to be, or what ought > to be done in order to achieve a given set of aims, as contrasted with > a descriptive science, that only asks what is. > > The thing that might trip a reader up at this point is Peirce's use of > the word "formal", a word that was wrung through so many strange turns > of meaning during the 20th Century that Peirce could have known not of. > > And I can see from several other discussions hereabouts that this very > word "formal" has already become the bone of contention and the source > of confusion that might have been predicted from its bedeviled history. > > So I will work on clearing that up over the weekend ... > > Jon Awbrey > > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o > inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > ¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey > getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-UserTalk:Jon_Awbrey > zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey > wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398 > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o > -- ---------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: [email protected] Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands ----------------------------------------------
hoekstra.vcf
(text/x-vcard, 317 B)
begin:vcard fn:Rinke Hoekstra n:Hoekstra;Rinke org:University of Amsterdam;Leibniz Center for Law adr:;;Postbus 1030;Amsterdam;NL;1000 BA;The Netherlands email;internet:[email protected] tel;work:+31205253499 tel;fax:+31205253495 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke version:2.1 end:vcard