General Comment (Was Re: Logic As Formal Semiotic)

Rinke Hoekstra <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.semantic-web,gmane.comp.inquiry
Organization Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Jon, others,

As a reader of the [email protected] list, I would like to make the 
following comment.

Your recent frequent (cross)posts to this list give me a strong feeling 
of deja-vu in an oh-no-not-again sort of way. I recall the fuss that 
arose in the good old days of the SUO mailinglist, and would very much 
like to be refrained from a re-enactment of those events.

This is a mailing list for discussing Semantic Web technology, and not 
philosophical issues related to ontology. Could you please try to 
prevent too much leakage of Ontolog-forum discussions to this list?

Thanks!

Best regards,

	Rinke Hoekstra


Jon Awbrey wrote:
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> 
> LAFS.  Note 5
> 
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> 
> I have been saying that C.S. Peirce defined logic as "formal semiotic",
> that is, a formal theory of signs, and I've been saying also that this
> conception of logic develops a classical line of thinking that regards
> logic among the normative sciences.  A normative science may be viewed
> as a "design science", an inquiry into what ought to be, or what ought
> to be done in order to achieve a given set of aims, as contrasted with
> a descriptive science, that only asks what is.
> 
> The thing that might trip a reader up at this point is Peirce's use of
> the word "formal", a word that was wrung through so many strange turns
> of meaning during the 20th Century that Peirce could have known not of.
> 
> And I can see from several other discussions hereabouts that this very
> word "formal" has already become the bone of contention and the source
> of confusion that might have been predicted from its bedeviled history.
> 
> So I will work on clearing that up over the weekend ...
> 
> Jon Awbrey
> 
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> ¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
> getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-UserTalk:Jon_Awbrey
> zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
> http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey
> wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> 

-- 
----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: [email protected]   Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499    Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,         Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,           PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,            The Netherlands
----------------------------------------------
hoekstra.vcf (text/x-vcard, 317 B)
begin:vcard
fn:Rinke Hoekstra
n:Hoekstra;Rinke
org:University of Amsterdam;Leibniz Center for Law
adr:;;Postbus 1030;Amsterdam;NL;1000 BA;The Netherlands
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;work:+31205253499
tel;fax:+31205253495
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
version:2.1
end:vcard
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.