Re: Logic As Formal Semiotic -- Discussion
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
DN = Duane Nickull
Re: LAFS 5. http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2007-08/msg00267.html
DN: IYO, does "formal" equate to normative meaning explicitly documented
so the knowledge represented can be shared? Is it generally in the
right direction?
Hi Duane,
I'm getting 'round tuit, as they say, but it's been a long week and
I really need to be out eating, drinking, and being merry an a' that,
so maybe I'll try to get the relevant Peirce quotes logged in at least
before taking off, and then discuss how I read them later this weekend.
Cheers !
¤
º
.°
\_/
|
-^-
Jon Awbrey
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-UserTalk:Jon_Awbrey
zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey
wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o