Re: Set Theories Without The Extensionality Axiom
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2009-July/013850.html I have explored systems where the usual membership relation is just one of many binary relations that potentially figure in the analysis or constitution of a given object, relative to a particular hierarchy called a "form of analysis", with no axiomatic guarantee that one can survey all conceivable forms of analysis in advance. If one indexes each such binary relation to the relevant form of analysis, then one is looking at a ternary relation that I found it amusing to call "relementhood". Jon Awbrey -- inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey knol: http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/3fkwvf69kridz/1