Re: Thoughts On Normative Sciences
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Kettelhut shared a link to his blog post on the normative sciences: http://www.listeningisthekey.com/?p=618 This inspired the following response: I don't suppose there's anything like a unique best way of regarding the normative sciences. In my oldest thoughts on the matter I can remember drawing a venn diagram with three circles for beauty, goodness, truth in which they all had equal status sub specie aeternitatis, from a god's eye view, as it were, but from a human point view we find that we are limited in our ability to recognize what is good in the way of conduct and what is true in the way of signs, so the human path to the central unity where the 3 are 1 comes to us via our sense of beauty. -- facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey knol profile: http://knol.google.com/k/Jon-Awbrey# oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey polmic: www.policymic.com/profiles/1110/Jon-Awbrey