Re: A Question About Peirce's Categories
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: Eduardo Forastieri At: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/7984 Eduardo, Just going by the last excerpt I quoted, and with due consideration given to all the qualifications I noted about trying to understand relational categories in non-relative terms, we might try to say something like the following as a first approximation: 1 • Present • What Is 2 • Perfect • What Has Been 3 • Future Participle (future as projected from the past and present) • What Is About To Be Ref. http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/languages/classical/latin/tchmat/grammar/vb/00800%20v-%20principal%20parts.pdf That at least begins to bring out some of the relational aspect of the categories. Regards, Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey word press blog 1: http://jonawbrey.wordpress.com/ word press blog 2: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/