Re: What Peirce Preserves

Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.inquiry
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Re: Peirce Preservation ("Studies in Logic" and Its Vicissitudes)
At: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8116

Irving & All,

The question of how logic, mathematics, phenomenology, and philosophy
in general relate to one another has come up again several times in
recent discussions, so let me refer once again to a statement from
Peirce that I always find enlightening on that score, at least,
with respect to how Peirce himself viewed their dependencies
and their relative standings as foundations.

| Normative science rests largely on phenomenology and on mathematics;
| Metaphysics on phenomenology and on normative science.
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 1.186 (1903)

Here is a digram of these relations, with the more basic inquiries
at the bottom and those that rest on them higher up in the ordering.

|
|
|                          o Metaphysics
|                         /|
|                        / |
|                       /  |
|    Normative Science o   |
|                     / \  |
|                    /   \ |
|                   /     \|
|      Mathematics o       o Phenomenology
|

Cf. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-March/001262.html

Regards,

Jon

-- 

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
word press blog 1: http://jonawbrey.wordpress.com/
word press blog 2: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.