Re: The Unmet Challenge of Peirce’s Work
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: Kirsti Määttänen At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8238 Thanks, Kirsti, It's hardly a new thought, of course, but one that won't let me alone. A dozen years of intense to intermittent participation on the Peirce List has led me to appreciate the fact that every reader will likely take away a different reading from all the most tantalizing passages in Peirce's work. But I'm beginning to see that trying to anticipate every possible interpretation leads to a state of hermeneutic paralysis. So I'm thinking I might try loosening up my readings a little bit, and simply say what I personally get out of them. We'll see if that works. Jon Määttänen Kirsti wrote: > Jon, > > I fully agree with your thoughts! > > Kirsti > > On 15.6.2012, at 20.32, Jon Awbrey wrote: > >> Peircers, >> >> I posted the following thoughts on my Inquiry Into Inquiry blog -- >> they have been nagging me for several months now, so I'm hoping >> that giving them this much vent will not only take a bit of the >> pressure off but maybe nudge me to develop them as time goes by. >> >> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/15/the-unmet-challenge-of-peirces-work/ -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache