Re: Proposal for a Mini Slow Read -- Kaina Stoich eia❢

Re: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8288

KM = Kirsti Määttänen

KM: I, for my part, am not even the least interested in finding
     in Kaina Stoichea materials for a formal theory of signs. --
     One of the reasons tor that is that  I do not think there
     is one to be found.

KM: If Jon is interested, he can of course, use tjhe piece for that end,
     and discuss it from that point of view. -- Still, I will be very
     surprised of any substantial findings.

KM: Jon, you are already familiar with this piece on Peirce's wrirings. --
     To ease my surprise give me one paragraph giving more than a clue
     for a formal theory of signs.

KM: In amazement, Kirsti ...

Maybe I'm amazed that you're amazed ...

How about this:

• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-%E2%80%A2-on-the-definition-of-logic/

Or this:

• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-%E2%80%A2-logic-as-semiotic/

Maybe you are attaching a different meaning to "formal axiomatic theory"?
But I believe I am using it in accord with my schooling -- that school of
thought that stretches its rope from Euclid through Peirce to the present.

Regards,

Jon

-- 

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
_______________________________________________
Inquiry mailing list
[email protected]
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry