Kaina Stoicheia -- Discussion
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:56:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: Gary Fuhrman At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8530 In: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8530 Gary & All, In the first passage Peirce is referring to the fact that infinite sets are equicardinal to some of their proper subsets, a property that can be used to define infinite sets, as Peirce did slightly before Dedekind. Missing this possibility was not do much an erroneous assumption of earlier mathematicians as a failure to define the various kinds of "size" that one might be talking about. The last two quotes reinforce the framework that Peirce gave for the relation of mathematics to the normative sciences, including logic. Cf. http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/05/31/definition-and-determination-4/ Regards, Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache