Re: Fuzzy Sets and Triadic Relations
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:45:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.philosophy.peirce,gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peircers,
We imagine all the things we might want to talk about
in a given discussion as collected together in a set X
called a “universe of discourse”. (In probabilistic or
statistical work it might be called a “sample space”.)
By way of shorthand notation, let us single out two
domains of values, the “boolean domain” B = {0, 1}
and the “unit interval” V = [0, 1]
In many applications, especially computational or
statistical ones, it is often useful to represent
any given subset S of X by means of a function or
mapping from X to B known as the “characteristic
function” or “indicator function” of S in X.
By way of notation, we write f_S : X -> B for
the indicator function of S in X, and define
it as follows:
f_S (x) = 1 if and only if x is an element of S.
All that is standard notions from ordinary set theory.
Fuzzy sets, more properly, fuzzy subsets of a given set X
will be defined in a way that generalizes the target values
in the previous definitions from the boolean values B to the
interval values V.
Tomorrow ...
Jon
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 381 B)
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to peirce-l but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe peirce-l" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .