Re: “What we’ve got here is (a) f ailure to communicate”

Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:45:43 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.inquiry
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Post   : “What we’ve got here is (a) failure to communicate” : 5
URL    : http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2013/11/12/what-weve-got-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate-5/
Posted : November 12, 2013 at 9:30 pm
Author : Jon Awbrey

Excerpt from Charles S. Peirce, “Minute Logic” (1902), CP 2.144–148

2.2. Why Study Logic?”

2.2.5. Reasoning and Expectation

144.   But since you propose to study logic, you have more or less faith in reasoning, as affording knowledge of the 
truth.  Now reasoning is a very different thing indeed from the percept, or even from perceptual facts.  For reasoning 
is essentially a voluntary act, over which we exercise control.  If it were not so, logic would be of no use at all. 
For logic is, in the main, criticism of reasoning as good or bad.  Now it is idle so to criticize an operation which is 
beyond all control, correction, or improvement.

145.   You have, therefore, to inquire, first, in what sense you have any faith in reasoning, seeing that its 
conclusions cannot in the least resemble the percepts, upon which alone implicit reliance is warranted.  Conclusions of 
reasoning can little resemble even the perceptual facts.  For besides being involuntary, these latter are strictly 
memories of what has taken place in the recent past, while all conclusions of reasoning partake of the general nature of 
expectations of the future.  What two things can be more disparate than a memory and an expectation?

⁂

147.   The second branch of the question, when you have decided in what your faith in reasoning consists, will inquire 
just what it is that justifies that faith.  The simulation of doubt about things indubitable or not really doubted is no 
more wholesome than is any other humbug;  yet the precise specification of the evidence for an undoubted truth often in 
logic throws a brilliant light in one direction or in another, now pointing to a corrected formulation of the 
proposition, now to a better comprehension of its relations to other truths, again to some valuable distinctions, etc.

148.   As to the former branch of this question, it will be found upon consideration that it is precisely the analogy of 
an inferential conclusion to an expectation which furnishes the key to the matter.  An expectation is a habit of 
imagining.  A habit is not an affection of consciousness;  it is a general law of action, such that on a certain general 
kind of occasion a man will be more or less apt to act in a certain general way.  An imagination is an affection of 
consciousness which can be directly compared with a percept in some special feature, and be pronounced to accord or 
disaccord with it.  Suppose for example that I slip a cent into a slot, and expect on pulling a knob to see a little 
cake of chocolate appear.  My expectation consists in, or at least involves, such a habit that when I think of pulling 
the knob, I imagine I see a chocolate coming into view.  When the perceptual chocolate comes into view, my imagination 
of it is a feeling of such a nature that the percept can be compared with it as to size, shape, the nature of the 
wrapper, the color, taste, flavor, hardness and grain of what is within.  Of course, every expectation is a matter of 
inference.  What an inference is we shall soon see more exactly than we need just now to consider.  For our present 
purpose it is sufficient to say that the inferential process involves the formation of a habit.  For it produces a 
belief, or opinion;  and a genuine belief, or opinion, is something on which a man is prepared to act, and is therefore, 
in a general sense, a habit.  A belief need not be conscious.

Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.), vols. 
7–8, Arthur W. Burks (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1931–1935, 1958.  Volume 2 : Elements of Logic, 
1932.  Reprinted with corrections, 1960.

-- 

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
_______________________________________________
Inquiry mailing list
[email protected]
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry