Frederik Stjernfelt • Natural Propos itions : 2

Post   : Frederik Stjernfelt =95 Natural Propositions : 2
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/09/08/frederik-stjernfelt-%e2%80%a2-natu=
ral-propositions-2/
Posted : September 8, 2014 at 9:30 am
Author : Jon Awbrey

Re: Jeffrey Brian Downard =95 Natural Propositions
At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13971

Jeff & All,

With regard to =93non-psychologism=94, it was a slip on my part to use that=
 term.  I don't think I've =

ever used it before.  At any rate I will try to avoid using it again.  It m=
ay sound like a trivial =

difference but I think there is a significant point to using the adjective =
=93non-psychological=94 in =

Peirce's =93non-psychological conception of logic=94 as distinguished from =
all the dualing and dueling =

substantives of isms and anti-isms.  I sense that I've written about this m=
any times before, so I =

will leave it at that.

A similar point applies to =93relativism=94 of course, debates about which =
are as interminable as they =

are inconsequential, ever missing the whole idea of Peirce's relational per=
spective on everything.

Regards,

Jon

-- =


academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache