Re: Peirce's 1880 “Algebra of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 2
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:45:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Inquiry Blog: =95 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01/30/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-= chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-preliminaries/ =95 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-= chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-1/ =95 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/03/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-= chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-2/ Peirce List Thread: JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15566 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15607 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15608 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15616 JW:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15624 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15634 JW:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15636 JW:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15639 JW:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15641 Jim, List, Apologies for the radio silence, I'm still bogged down in the process of trying to sort umpteen years worth of files between two computers whose incept dates are a generation apart, just in human years, and it may be a few days before I can remember what I had in mind here. I know it had something to do with the problem of integrating, synthesizing, or just plain maintaining the natural relationship between extensional and intensional descriptions of subject matters, whether in "factual" or "fictional" worlds, real or imaginary domains, phenomenology or mathematics. The tension between these two -tensions bears a relation to the difference between empiricist and rationalist approaches to knowledge. I think this is due to the fact that data comes to us in extensional form, at any rate that's the way it is when we set to work on organized scientific research. Not too coincidentally, I ran into the same difference in cognitive styles when I started developing programs for "inquiry driven" intelligent systems. Have to break here ... Jon -- = academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache