Re: Re: my Bidi implementation

Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

>Hummm,  I think you are not missing anything, and most probably
>you are right.  Right now that I think myself, I find it
>reasonable.  I think the niether Arabeyes, nor PuTTY people
>really checked it on fsf.org.  The scenario was that I said
>"FriBidi is LGPLed, you can dynamically link to it, like xterm
>does."  And people said "No, we want putty.exe to be standalone,
>so FriBidi is not an option."
>
>Thanks for the note Shachar,
>--behdad
>  behdad.org
>  
>
They can't put the sources for fribidi inside their sources, or they 
must clearly label it as a bunch of sources under a different license. I 
don't see any problem with statically linking a library, though.

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click