Re: A (too huge) Arabic word-list (with prefixes) for spell-checkers

Mohammed Sameer <[email protected]> Tue, 16 May 2006 12:26:48 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.linux.region.israel.ivrix.discuss,gmane.comp.internationalization.arabeyes.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:18AM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> I have converted Tim Buckwalter's database of Arabic - including all suff=
ixes
> and prefixes - to the Aspell format. This makes it possible to spell-check
> Arabic in Aspell, Mozilla Thunderbird, and OpenOffice - if you can spare =
some
> 200Mb of RAM.
>=20
 > It is freely available under the GPL, on
> 	http://ivrix.org.il/projects/arabic .
>=20

Hi Dan,

Note: I'm not criticizing, I'm just stating facts and trying to be construc=
tive

Originally, I worked on a fork of Duali, The Arabic spell checker by M. Elz=
ubeir.
I then realized that aspell can do it and that we do not need an Arabic spe=
ll checker.

I had a look at the Buckwalter data since it was the data set for both spel=
l checkers.

Something we didn't notice before we didn't have a working spell checker im=
plementation.
The data set contains words from the Holy Quran, The words in the Holy Qura=
n are sometimes
spelled in a different way due to the script used to write the Quran.

Those words are incorrect outside the Quran context.

Which leads to 2 points:
1) Those words are not correct
2) The data files contain a small set of incorrect words "Maybe this is a p=
roblem with
my implementation of the Buckwalter algorithm".
3) The affix data is huge and IMHO not easy to modify/extend which means
that it'll be hard to strip those words.

This is why I decided to ignore the Buckwalter data and work on a new data =
set.

I know about a google project to create a dictionary from the Buckwalter da=
ta which
makes me wonder, Why don't you cooperate with them ?

PS. Why "DICT ar EG ar" only in dictionary.lst ? ;-)

Best wishes,

--=20
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Member.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature

--AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEaZrXy2aOKaP9DfcRAoFeAJ9OeF6zhNohZw9KHLuvSe7VPzRZJwCeNNIY
6w0JoyxJpr5Q+49K6Tb5veE=
=whbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD--