Re: A (too huge) Arabic word-list (with prefixes) for spell-checkers
Mohammed Sameer <[email protected]> Tue, 16 May 2006 12:26:48 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.region.israel.ivrix.discuss,gmane.comp.internationalization.arabeyes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:18AM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have converted Tim Buckwalter's database of Arabic - including all suff= ixes > and prefixes - to the Aspell format. This makes it possible to spell-check > Arabic in Aspell, Mozilla Thunderbird, and OpenOffice - if you can spare = some > 200Mb of RAM. >=20 > It is freely available under the GPL, on > http://ivrix.org.il/projects/arabic . >=20 Hi Dan, Note: I'm not criticizing, I'm just stating facts and trying to be construc= tive Originally, I worked on a fork of Duali, The Arabic spell checker by M. Elz= ubeir. I then realized that aspell can do it and that we do not need an Arabic spe= ll checker. I had a look at the Buckwalter data since it was the data set for both spel= l checkers. Something we didn't notice before we didn't have a working spell checker im= plementation. The data set contains words from the Holy Quran, The words in the Holy Qura= n are sometimes spelled in a different way due to the script used to write the Quran. Those words are incorrect outside the Quran context. Which leads to 2 points: 1) Those words are not correct 2) The data files contain a small set of incorrect words "Maybe this is a p= roblem with my implementation of the Buckwalter algorithm". 3) The affix data is huge and IMHO not easy to modify/extend which means that it'll be hard to strip those words. This is why I decided to ignore the Buckwalter data and work on a new data = set. I know about a google project to create a dictionary from the Buckwalter da= ta which makes me wonder, Why don't you cooperate with them ? PS. Why "DICT ar EG ar" only in dictionary.lst ? ;-) Best wishes, --=20 GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature --AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEaZrXy2aOKaP9DfcRAoFeAJ9OeF6zhNohZw9KHLuvSe7VPzRZJwCeNNIY 6w0JoyxJpr5Q+49K6Tb5veE= =whbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD--