AW: License question to the project owners

Stefan Wanger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.internationalization.fribidi
Message-ID <A0BC62EEBEA1D0119EFD0020AFF9BE270174A29B@MAJESTIX>
Canceled!

Sorry, this message was sent twice due to problems with our mail server

Stefan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stefan Wanger 
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 15:34
An: 'Beni Cherniavsky'; Paulo Soares
Cc: '[email protected]'
Betreff: AW: [Fribidi-discuss] License question to the project owners

Hi,

i have read your discussion. 

I have a problem with the bidi algorithm. See original message below.
It has nothing to do with fribidi, because I decided to take ICU. Maybe you
can help me, because it is a bidi problem. Maybe you have the same problem
solved with fribidi so far.

Thanks 

Stefan



Original message:

Hi,

i am testing ICU 2.4 with your Layout sample.

But i have problems with embedded levels using the ubidi_setPara und 
ubidi_getLogicalRun API.

This is my sample in logical order.  <<12 34 56 78 90.txt>> 

12 34 56 78 AB 90

AB are strong RTL characters. Paragrapg level is LTR. "34 56" should be 
treated as RTL run

How can I achieve the following visual output:

12 56 34 78 BA 90

I tried 2 solutions

1. if i am using embedded levels ("00011110000000000") with ubidi_setPara, 
AB is not resolved as RTL run, when calling ubidi_getLogicalRun.

2. if i am using the RLE keyword (12 <RLE>34 56<PDF> 78 AB 90), the output 
is  12 90 BA 78 56 34

Please show me the right way.

I would be very glad, if you can help.

Thanks

Stefan Wanger


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Beni Cherniavsky [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:10
An: Paulo Soares
Cc: '[email protected]'
Betreff: Re: [Fribidi-discuss] License question to the project owners

Paulo Soares wrote on 2003-07-11:

> I'm an iText (www.lowagie.com/iText) developer. iText is a java library
for
> the generation of PDF documents that has a dual license, LGPL or MPL/LGPL.
>
> I decided to look around for an awt independent solution to get the order
> levels and fribidi came on top of my list not only for conformance reasons
> but also because it has a clean architecture, or at least an architecture
> that I can understand.
>
Fribidi is in C which will require an extra wrapper layer.  `UAX 9`_
has demo code in C++ and Java, is that of any use (code-wise and
license-wise)?  I must admit I never looked at it, just guessing that
it's worth a look since your library is in Java...

.. _UAX 9: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/tr9-11.html

-- 
Beni Cherniavsky <[email protected]>

If I don't hack on it, who will?  And if I don't GPL it, what am I?
And if it itches, why not now?  [With apologies to Hilel ;]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Fribidi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fribidi-discuss


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Fribidi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fribidi-discuss


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.