AW: License question to the project owners
Stefan Wanger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.fribidi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A0BC62EEBEA1D0119EFD0020AFF9BE270174A29B@MAJESTIX> |
Canceled! Sorry, this message was sent twice due to problems with our mail server Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stefan Wanger Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 15:34 An: 'Beni Cherniavsky'; Paulo Soares Cc: '[email protected]' Betreff: AW: [Fribidi-discuss] License question to the project owners Hi, i have read your discussion. I have a problem with the bidi algorithm. See original message below. It has nothing to do with fribidi, because I decided to take ICU. Maybe you can help me, because it is a bidi problem. Maybe you have the same problem solved with fribidi so far. Thanks Stefan Original message: Hi, i am testing ICU 2.4 with your Layout sample. But i have problems with embedded levels using the ubidi_setPara und ubidi_getLogicalRun API. This is my sample in logical order. <<12 34 56 78 90.txt>> 12 34 56 78 AB 90 AB are strong RTL characters. Paragrapg level is LTR. "34 56" should be treated as RTL run How can I achieve the following visual output: 12 56 34 78 BA 90 I tried 2 solutions 1. if i am using embedded levels ("00011110000000000") with ubidi_setPara, AB is not resolved as RTL run, when calling ubidi_getLogicalRun. 2. if i am using the RLE keyword (12 <RLE>34 56<PDF> 78 AB 90), the output is 12 90 BA 78 56 34 Please show me the right way. I would be very glad, if you can help. Thanks Stefan Wanger -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Beni Cherniavsky [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:10 An: Paulo Soares Cc: '[email protected]' Betreff: Re: [Fribidi-discuss] License question to the project owners Paulo Soares wrote on 2003-07-11: > I'm an iText (www.lowagie.com/iText) developer. iText is a java library for > the generation of PDF documents that has a dual license, LGPL or MPL/LGPL. > > I decided to look around for an awt independent solution to get the order > levels and fribidi came on top of my list not only for conformance reasons > but also because it has a clean architecture, or at least an architecture > that I can understand. > Fribidi is in C which will require an extra wrapper layer. `UAX 9`_ has demo code in C++ and Java, is that of any use (code-wise and license-wise)? I must admit I never looked at it, just guessing that it's worth a look since your library is in Java... .. _UAX 9: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/tr9-11.html -- Beni Cherniavsky <[email protected]> If I don't hack on it, who will? And if I don't GPL it, what am I? And if it itches, why not now? [With apologies to Hilel ;] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Fribidi-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fribidi-discuss ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Fribidi-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fribidi-discuss ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01