Re: FriBidi's license (was - my Bidi...)

Roozbeh Pournader <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.internationalization.fribidi,gmane.comp.internationalization.arabeyes.devel
Organization Sharif FarsiWeb Inc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 19:39, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> by using or even writing our own Bidi

/me is very shocked to hear that!

Why in hell did we spend those many hours working on FriBidi's 100%
Unicode compatiblity if one will still need to write a new bidi engine
for many free software applications?

That's something to think about. I seriously believe we should change
the license to a more liberal license, and the Putty case is proof
enough. We should consider asking the opinion of GNU people of course,
as I don't want to lose the GNU package status.

IIRC, we at least had one contributor who was against relicensing his
work (can't remember whom). Is there anyone else?

roozbeh




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.