Re: FriBidi's license
Nadim Shaikli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.fribidi,gmane.comp.internationalization.arabeyes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, in the case of PuTTY, there are a 10 things to consider: > > * The weakest point in bidi support in PuTTY is not the bidi > alg, but the semantics of the terminal. > > * PuTTY is a no-op in Linux IMO As noted this is NOT a PuTTY issue - or better yet "forget PuTTY entirely", we'll go about dealing with that application differently (ie. in an unassociated manner to fribidi). As I've stated earlier - this is purely a "how best to license FriBidi" issue now (and I'm not taking any sides since I haven't contributed to the project and don't feel right putting in my $0.02's worth even :-). If the consensus is that it is a non-issue then so be it. Regards, - Nadim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click