Re: Invalid UTF-8 for Arabic
Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <[email protected]> Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:33:33 +0330
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.fribidi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Yoann, I haven't used fribidi on windows, but I just run the fribid executable in linux on your input. The result differs a lot: $ hexdump -C arabic.output-unix 00000000 d8 9f d8 a7 d9 84 20 d8 a7 d8 b0 d8 a7 d9 85 d9 |...... .........| 00000010 84 20 d9 88 d8 a3 20 d8 a7 d8 b0 d8 a7 d9 85 d9 |. .... .........| 00000020 84 20 d8 9f d9 85 d9 88 d9 8a 20 d9 84 d9 83 20 |. ........ .... | 00000030 d8 b1 d9 88 d8 b7 d9 81 d9 84 d8 a7 20 d9 84 d9 |............ ...| 00000040 88 d8 a7 d9 86 d8 aa d8 aa 20 d9 84 d9 87 |......... ....| 0000004e compared to your output: $ hexdump -C arabic.output 00000000 d8 9f ef bb bb ef bb bf 20 ef ba 8d ef ba ab ef |........ .......| 00000010 ba 8e ef bb a4 ef bb 9f 20 ef bb ad ef ba 83 20 |........ ...... | 00000020 ef ba 8d ef ba ab ef ba 8e ef bb a4 ef bb 9f 20 |............... | 00000030 d8 9f ef bb a1 ef bb ae ef bb b3 20 ef bb 9e ef |........... ....| 00000040 bb 9b 20 ef ba ad ef bb ae ef bb 84 ef bb 94 ef |.. .............| 00000050 bb 9f ef ba 8d 20 ef bb 9d ef bb ad ef ba 8e ef |..... ..........| 00000060 bb a8 ef ba 98 ef ba 97 20 ef bb 9e ef bb ab |........ ......| 0000006f I'm almost sure the unix output has no wrong utf-8 sequence, but the windows output seems so wrong. Just for the reference, the input for both outputs was this: $ hexdump -C arabic.input 00000000 d9 87 d9 84 20 d8 aa d8 aa d9 86 d8 a7 d9 88 d9 |.... ...........| 00000010 84 20 d8 a7 d9 84 d9 81 d8 b7 d9 88 d8 b1 20 d9 |. ............ .| 00000020 83 d9 84 20 d9 8a d9 88 d9 85 d8 9f 20 d9 84 d9 |... ........ ...| 00000030 85 d8 a7 d8 b0 d8 a7 20 d8 a3 d9 88 20 d9 84 d9 |....... .... ...| 00000040 85 d8 a7 d8 b0 d8 a7 20 d9 84 d8 a7 d8 9f |....... ......| 0000004e Hope it helps. -Behnam ZWNJ On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Yoann Roman <[email protected]> wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >>> I'm using the trunk fribidi2 code, compiled with VS2003 on Windows >>> XP, from Python with the Pyfribidi extension, also compiled on VS >>> 2003. >> >> The first step to debug this is to make sure PyFriBidi is not the >> culprit. That is, can you reproduce the bug using C? If yes, please >> send the code here. > > I'm no C expert, so I took a slightly different approach to pull > Pyfribidi out of the equation. I compiled fribidi.exe and used a Hex > editor to check its output. Looks like the lost final byte may be a > Pyfribidi problem. This test did bring up another bug, though. > > Attached is a zip with: > > - arabic.input: the Arabic string straight out of Python. This will > show up correctly in anything with bidi support (e.g., Notepad on > Windows XP with Arabic support installed). There is no BOM. > > - arabic.output: output from running bin\fribidi.exe --nopad > arabic.input. No Python involved here. > > - arabic-correct.png: a correct Word visual representation > > - arabic-incorrect.png: what I get using arabic.output > > If you open arabic.output in a Hex editor, you'll see that bytes 5 > through 7 contain the UTF-8 BOM sequence. It looks like no characters > are missing, though. > > Is this enough info to track this new issue down? > > Thanks, > > -- > Yoann Roman > > _______________________________________________ > fribidi mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fribidi > > -- ' بهنام اسفهبد ' Behnam Esfahbod ' * .. http://behnam.esfahbod.info * ` * * o * http://zwnj.org _______________________________________________ fribidi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fribidi