[openi18n-im:01096] Re: name space cleanup

Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:53:29 +0900 (JST)
From: Akira TAGOH <[email protected]>:
> >>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:27:53 +0900,
> >>>>> "AK" == AShiZaWa KaZuNoRi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> AK> By the way, I've found that FHS claims the following.
> AK> (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html)
> 
> AK>   /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages
> AK>   Purpose
> 
> AK>   /usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal
> AK>   binaries that are not intended to be executed directly by
> AK>   users or shell scripts. [22]
> 
> AK> Would somebody tell me the interpretation of the sentence?  It
> AK> means that internal binaries that are intended to be executed in
> AK> SYSTEM shell scripts should NOT go to into /usr/lib?
> 
> For example, iiimf-segv-logger, which I added for logging
> the backtrace, isn't intended to be executed directly by
> users. such binaries should go under /usr/lib. also, the aux
> object binaries, which isn't the shared libraries, should go
> under /usr/lib.
> In particular, which binaries are you worrying about this
> claim?

Four binaries.

iiimd (htt), which is executed by init script.
iiim-server (htt_server), which is executed by iiimd (htt).
iiimx (httx), which is executed by X startup script.
iiim-xbe (htt_xbe), which is executed by iiimx (httx).

These binaries are not intended to be executed directly by
users, even though they can be.

Thanks,
-- 
kasha