[openi18n-im:01125] Re: iiimcf/iiimgcf/compose keys

Owen Taylor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.internationalization.input-methods
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:23 -0800, Hideki Hiura wrote:
> Hi Shao,
> 
> > From: Yu Shao <[email protected]>
> > Right now, european dead keys are not handled in iiimgcf, seems only in 
> > unit LE, I am just wondering should we put this part of code into 
> > iiimcf, so both gtk and qt will be able to handle compose keys correctly?
> 
> UNIT has a capability of handling necessary composition, so just
> passing through to UNIT would do the necessary operations for compose 
> keys/dead keys.
> We've recently encountered the problem that some keys seem not being
> passed to libiiimcf regarding deadkey operation.
> 
> By using the LE specific hotkey, UNIT will designates Compose key and dead 
> keys as hotkeys so that the composition can be done dynamically, while
> conversion is off.
> 
> Is your suggestion to put the composition logic itself to libiiimcf?

I don't have the full background here, but I think the concern was when
the selected language engine was something other than UNIT ... a
Chinese, or Japanese language engine, say. 

Are (latin) dead keys and compose key handling expected to work when
conversion for such a language engine is off?

Regards,
						Owen
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBm5PES+2LB0B90LERAiJmAJ414GEGSBwrRkf/HXGt0yFax5OC8ACgowsT
a7omeZ+g8ganpmuHZjnkhNE=
=MiHS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.