[openi18n-im:01125] Re: iiimcf/iiimgcf/compose keys
Owen Taylor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.input-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:23 -0800, Hideki Hiura wrote: > Hi Shao, > > > From: Yu Shao <[email protected]> > > Right now, european dead keys are not handled in iiimgcf, seems only in > > unit LE, I am just wondering should we put this part of code into > > iiimcf, so both gtk and qt will be able to handle compose keys correctly? > > UNIT has a capability of handling necessary composition, so just > passing through to UNIT would do the necessary operations for compose > keys/dead keys. > We've recently encountered the problem that some keys seem not being > passed to libiiimcf regarding deadkey operation. > > By using the LE specific hotkey, UNIT will designates Compose key and dead > keys as hotkeys so that the composition can be done dynamically, while > conversion is off. > > Is your suggestion to put the composition logic itself to libiiimcf? I don't have the full background here, but I think the concern was when the selected language engine was something other than UNIT ... a Chinese, or Japanese language engine, say. Are (latin) dead keys and compose key handling expected to work when conversion for such a language engine is off? Regards, Owen
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBm5PES+2LB0B90LERAiJmAJ414GEGSBwrRkf/HXGt0yFax5OC8ACgowsT a7omeZ+g8ganpmuHZjnkhNE= =MiHS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----