[openi18n-im:01206] Re: Feature discussion heat starting from..
Leon Ho <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.input-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, For the feature owners in current IIIMF dashboard page (http://www.openi18n.org/modules.php? op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=102&page=1 ) Anything that should bring forward to continue in r12.2? Anything that will be completed within r12.2 timeframe, and anything that needed to be stalled for this release? Anyone interested on picking some features implementation out of this list? Regards, Leon On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:51 +1000, Leon Ho wrote: > I think the point in here is to pick something that is enough worth one > and an half months of development (As development starts on Mar 01 and > end on Apr 22). > > What are the stuff that can able to: > - meet this timeframe > - important to get it done asap > - anyone interested to implement > > It would be good if we can discuss or at least elaborate the feature > with brief description > > Features that mentioned before: > - IIIMQCF > - GIMLET enhancement > - UI > - Communications with other part of IIIMF (i.e. getting notification > if server is up or not?) > - Applet (moves to systray to support Qt/KDE?) > - A common configuration tools/placeholder for different LE? > - Common GUI framework > - m17nlib support > - hotkey/trigger key area (anything else like xml config?) > - namespace I/O API > - vmseparator > - Keyboard mapper > - Increase performance/decrease footprint? > - Some ways normal user without running root (or different users) to > enable IIIMF access? > - Specific LEs new features? > - more? > > Leon > > > > > 15:26 <@toshi> listing them quickly here now, we talked about gimlet > > enhancement, common GUI frawework, keyboard mapper, m17nlib support, ... > > 15:28 <@llch> we talked about gimlet plugin module for LE configurations, > > gimlet UI enhancement, gimlet applet enhancement, integration of gnome > > core with IIIMF ... > > > > As we use this as a starting point to initialize the feature discussion > > from here? > >