[openi18n-im:01236] Re: path name chages in r12.2

AShiZaWa KaZuNoRi wrote:
> current/description               proposed path name
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/lib/im/httx               -> /usr/bin/iiimx

> /usr/lib/im/htt_xbe            -> /usr/bin/iiim-xbe

If users don't run this directly, it could also go to $libdir/iiim/ or
$libexecdir/ ?

> /usr/lib/im/htt                -> /usr/bin/iiimd
> /usr/lib/im/htt_server         -> /usr/bin/iiim-server
> /usr/lib/im/                   -> /usr/lib/iiim/
> /usr/lib/im/leif/              -> /usr/lib/iiim/le/
> /usr/lib/im/leif/<LE>.so       -> /usr/lib/iiim/le/<LE>/<LE>.so
> /usr/lib/im/locale/<LOC>/<LE>/ -> /usr/lib/iiim/le/<LE>/
> IIIMF static data              -> /usr/share/iiim/
> LE static data                 -> /usr/share/iiim/le/<LE>/
> include files                  -> /usr/include/iiim/
> public libraries               -> /usr/lib/libiiim*.*
> /etc/init.d/IIim               -> /etc/init.d/iiim-server
> IIIMF host specific files      -> /etc/iiim/
> LE host specific files         -> /etc/iiim/le/<LE>/
> IIIMF volatile date            -> /var/lib/iiim/
> LE volatile data               -> /var/lib/iiim/le/<LE>/

Yes, basically looks nice and clean to me. :)

With this naming it seems better to name the project and tarball(s) "iiim"
rather than "iiimf" (as previously suggested last year).

Jens