[openi18n-im:01303] Re: [proposal] distribute parts of im-sdk separately

Leon Ho wrote:

>>gnome-im-switcher ---> iiim-switcher-applet
> 
> Are we still calling it applet since we have migration to systray on the 
> horizon.

Good point: so how about just iiim-switcher say?
Or anyone have a better idea?

>>iiimxcf/*  ---> iiim-xim ?
> 
> Yes a bit unsure on this one. Probably iiim-client-x or iiimf-client-xim?

Right.  So I suggest:

 iiimxcf/htt_xbe ---> iiim-client-xim
 iiimxcf/xiiimp  ---> iiim-lib-xim

Jens