Re: debian bug #642666

Hi!

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:21:07PM +0100, phantomjinx wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
> 
> A little confused why this needed reclassifying against libgpod-dev?
 
Easy: libgpod-dev depended on some libraries that weren't put in
Build-Depends list ;-) So, the issue was not about gtkpod, but on
libgpod-dev, called by gtkpod in the building process.

> Is it that libgpod is not available? I think the really odd bit is that
> configure is finding libgpod using pkgconfig but the pkgconfig file
> seems to not provide any include hints.

Those needed libs were not defined as dependencies in latest libgpod
build. First row for libimobiledevice-dev.
Now it has been corrected and the new upload for libgpod is on its way
to unstable... sooner than later :-)
 
> Let me know what the solution might end up being as I am curious.

We don't have to do nothing now... just wait for the new libgpod to
become available in the official archives, so the auto-build process can
test the source package again and find all the libs it needs ;-)

Happy hacking.

mfv

-- 
Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
risultato non infetto.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1