Re: Longer legal links?
"Rob Kyle" <MBCX0RK2-RHlZi5nFZCOi2/woJv4GR1pr/1R2p/[email protected]> Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:46:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.isp.consume.bristol |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Manchester |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I see, this depends though on both ends of the links having this same setup. Unfortunately, I think the major problems of range (within cities) are due to obstacles blocking LOS, and not lack of power. Rob From: "Andy Laurence" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [consumebristol] Longer legal links? Date sent: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:42:25 +0100 Send reply to: [email protected] > > How does having a more sensitive Rx antenna increase Tx range? > > OK, basically, we're limited by a legal maximum transmit power of 20dB. > Most cards use the same antenna for transmit *and* receive. By having a > transmit antenna and a receive antenna, you can increase gain on the receive > end, as this is not regulated by law. The distance you can get a signal is > regulated by the number of decibels your link has. > > For example, my card at home is a 15dB model, and has a 5dB antenna on it. > If two identical machines like this were setup, then there would be 15db + > 5dB+ 5dB = 25dB in the link. That's transmit power (15dB) + transmit gain > (5dB) + receive gain (5dB). If > you can increase receive gain without increasing transmit gain, the numbers > will be higher, and therefore go further. > > transmit power + transmit gain must be less than 20dB > transmit power + transmit gain + receive gain relates to distance > (bigger=further) > > Also, there is leakage between the antennas, so there are other things to > consider which were explained in the previous mail. It all boils down to > longer links whilst staying legal. > > Andy > >