[ ispman-Feature Requests-1515358 ] Support email forwarding only
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Jul 2006 06:50:03 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.isp.ispman.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Feature Requests item #1515358, was opened at 2006-06-30 23:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by s0undt3ch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358390&aid=1515358&group_id=8390 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pedro Algarvio (s0undt3ch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support email forwarding only Initial Comment: Currently ISPMan/Postfix, when a user set's a forwarding address, delivers both to the local mailbox and the forwarded address. For me this is bad. I'd hate to see users that mail a user I host, but has a forwarding address, to get bounces because the local mailbox has it's quota in full use. My sugestion is add an extra option, 'forwards only'. With this setting, the message arriving for a user with a forward address, would only be forwarded and not also delivered localy. How would one implement this in the user's ldap entry? Well, if 'forwards only' is set, the user's mailRoutingAddress would be equal to mailForwardingAddress and the virtual_alias_maps ldap lookup would only(and always) retrieve the mailRoutingAddress. If 'forwards only' is not set, mailRoutingAddress would be mapped like it used to be, and the mailForwardingAddress, well, would be the email forward address, yet, one would only retrieve the mailRoutingAddress for the virtual_alias_maps ldap lookup. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Pedro Algarvio (s0undt3ch) Date: 2006-07-01 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=927681 A we might just temporarely setup forwarding for a user, so why shoudl we delete the mailbox? If a user was setup with a mailbox, the mailbox should only be deleted if and when the user is deleted. About the forwarding, it should be ISPman's work, to delete the mailRoutingAddress attribute when setting up forwarding afterwards. But since we might want to have it deliver to both addresses, hence my sugestion for a checkbox with a var of 'forwarding only'. This way we can have both behaviours. I leave the ticket closed because I was not the one to close it, but in my opinion, the ticket should be open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joerg Delker (jdelker) Date: 2006-07-01 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43997 That's not necessary as everything is already there. When creating a user, you may select "forwarding only" when selecting the mail server. This will route mail only to the mailRoutingAddress. Changing this afterwards is currently not supported by ISPMan itself. This would require additional logic that creates/deletes the mailbox on change. Nevertheless, for a user with local delivery, you may just delete the mailRoutingAddress attribute to disable any local delivery. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358390&aid=1515358&group_id=8390 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642