Re: Gump, centipede, maven, etc...

dIon Gillard wrote:

 >> I believe that the information that a pure bootstrapping approach
 >> provides is quite valuable.
 > I agree.

 >> I don't know how to get this dones across all of the various
 >> codebases, but I am willing to do my part.  Are there maven and/or
 >> centipede developers out there who share this goal?
 > I'm happy to do my part.

dIon, can you take a look at 
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-11-24/commons-vfs.html ?  This 
built successfully on 2002-11-20, but failed on 2002-11-21.

It seems that the build.xml is generated, and has a hardcoded path in it 
that makes no sense on my Linux box.  I could override it in the project 
definition, but that too is generated and in the jakarta-commons/vfs cvs 
tree.

One solution would be to correct the maven.xml and/or maven itself and 
check in a corrected build.xml and/or gump.xml.

Another solution would be to ignore the generated gump.xml and construct 
one by hand that works, perhaps checking it into gump/project directory.

What would you suggest?

- Sam Ruby

P.S.  To compound this problem, there was a problem whereby the nag 
messages were not being sent for this component.  This is now fixed.